Etrade, Ameritrade, Scottrade? Whats best

Hits for this post:3772 | Popularity: 6%
Written by ghosthost ? published on April 8th, 2007
1 year, 7 months ago

I have an Etrade account and a Scottrade account. I liked the Scottrade because the commisions were low and the speed of fills were pretty good. But I went to the new no commission brokerage Zecco.com for trading penny stocks, although you could trade any stock you want as far as I know.

The only fees on the Zecco trades are the mandatory SEC fees that amount to very little. You can’t escape from those fees.

Over all I found the Zecco brokerage pretty good and have no complaints. It does take $2500.00 minimum to open the account though.

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Netvouz
  • RawSugar
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • Smarking
  • Spurl
  • TailRank
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb
Latest Post From Each Category

This entry was posted on Sunday, April 8th, 2007 at 11:54 am and is filed under HYIP Investigation. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. .

One Response to “Etrade, Ameritrade, Scottrade? Whats best”


Top 5 Commenters at Our Blog
  1. Haisrette: 18
  2. Pramudita: 12
  3. Melissa: 10
  4. Hannes: 9
  5. Gold_Hunter: 5

You can subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post. You can also reply to this post directly in your weblog, and take advantage of the TrackBack URI to record your reply in this post.

  1. Steve says:
    April 17th, 2007 at 7:40 am
    Using Firefox Firefox 2.0.0.3 on Windows Windows XP

    Scottrade Service is Crappy

    They have 40 private companies feeding them news, but these companies sometimes spew out false information. For example they published a report saying that the FDA rejected a drug in a company I was invested in. The stock fell $2 that day! But the FDA did not reject the drug. I contacted them, and so did dozens of other people, but they REFUSED to take down the headline.

    Bottom line is they allow themselves to be used by Hedge Funds and biased analysts to scare investors and make fast money to spread false info. If they do not have control over what is shown on their website then how can you trust them?

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>


Verification Image

Please type the letters you see in the picture.

Story pulse

graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.graph element.

391 total reads, averaging 3 daily